Should I return home or stay abroad?
After years abroad, “going home” can sound like a return to something known.
The familiarity of the word can hide how much has changed since you left.
The real comparison is between the life you have built abroad and the life you could build now in your country of origin. The life you had before leaving is no longer one of the available options.
Each option may contain things you value, losses you would have to accept and assumptions you have not yet tested.
The question, then, is which future life fits your current responsibilities, relationships, priorities and options better, and how much of that judgment rests on facts rather than memories, fears or hopes.
First, define what “home” means now
The word home can hide several different things.
For some people, home is where parents and siblings live. For others, it is the language that feels most natural, the country where they grew up, the place where their children are growing up or the community where close friends now live. Security, professional opportunity, familiar institutions and the place where you imagine aging can all pull in different directions.
Those answers may point to different countries.
For a partner or children, your country of origin may not carry the same meaning that it carries for you. Their perspective can therefore be fully legitimate while your own attachment remains equally real.
Before deciding whether to go home, specify which benefits of home you are actually trying to recover.
Separate attraction to home from rejection of life abroad
Two very different processes can produce the same sentence:
“I want to go home.”
Sometimes the pull comes from what you genuinely want to recover: closer family relationships, daily life in your language and culture, stronger contact between your children and relatives, a greater sense of rootedness or a future you can picture there.
At other times, the urge to return is driven more by what is going badly abroad. A job may no longer fit, housing may have become difficult, social life may feel thin, or distance and bureaucracy may simply be wearing you down. A relationship or work situation may also be part of the pressure.
The distinction matters because returning may solve some problems and leave others untouched.
Run a counterfactual:
If the two or three hardest parts of my current life abroad improved without moving countries, would I still want to return?
If you would still want to return after those problems improved, the pull toward home probably has weight of its own. If the desire fades, the first decision may be about changing your current situation rather than changing countries.
The answer helps identify the problem you are actually trying to solve.
Build the decision map
The map separates what is known from what is being projected. It keeps the comparison explicit without turning it into a score.
Known facts
Write down what is currently verified on both sides: your work situation; partner’s work; children’s current schooling and languages; housing; recurring costs; proximity to family; people you actually see and rely on; caregiving responsibilities; professional network; current legal or administrative status; and any verified condition that affects the possibility of staying, leaving or returning later.
Assumptions
Common assumptions include expecting family to be constantly available, assuming old friendships will restart immediately, believing children will adapt quickly or that comparable work will be easy to find. You may also be counting on life feeling simpler, on being able to move abroad again later, or on your current frustrations and career situation remaining unchanged.
A return decision becomes fragile when most of the expected benefits live in this column.
Constraints
Identify what cannot be treated like an ordinary preference: a verified residency or work-right issue; a partner who cannot or will not move; custody or caregiving arrangements; a child’s specific needs; a professional licensing requirement; a hard financial constraint; safety; or another condition that makes an option infeasible.
Where the constraint is legal, tax, immigration, health or another regulated matter, verify it externally. This guide does not resolve it.
Trade-offs
Name the exchanges in plain language. More family proximity may come with a narrower professional market. Career opportunity may mean greater distance from aging parents. Cultural familiarity for one person can mean a loss of familiarity for a partner. Lower costs may also mean lower earnings, while greater belonging can require giving up continuity and certainty. The direction of the trade can just as easily be reversed.
Conditions that would change the balance
Test the conditions that could genuinely change your preference. A confirmed job at home may make return more attractive, while much weaker prospects for a partner may pull the other way. More time with family each year could make staying easier to accept, and a less available social network at home could reduce one of the expected benefits of returning. Changes in your current job, housing or community may also matter. Where possible, consider whether a time-limited return or another reversible test would give you useful information once the legal and practical constraints are clear.
By this point, you should have a clearer sense of what could actually change your view.
Compare two present-day realities
A common asymmetry is to compare every frustration of present life abroad with the best remembered parts of the country of origin.
The reverse can happen too: people may compare an idealized life abroad with an outdated negative picture of home.
Use the same standard on both sides.
For the country where you currently live, describe an ordinary week as it exists now. For the country of origin, build an ordinary week from current evidence rather than memory.
Build a realistic ordinary week for each place. Think about where you would live, the commute, the people you would actually see, the support that would really be available and any new family obligations proximity might create. Include the work you could realistically do, your partner’s week, school and friendships for children, access to the services and activities you use, and what you would miss from the life already built abroad.
Research on reacculturation is a useful warning here: returning to a familiar country can still require adjustment. [2]
Examine what family proximity would actually change
Being close to family can be one of the strongest reasons to return. In the studies used here, family ties and belonging emerge as important factors in return decisions; one study also emphasizes responsibility and care. [1][3]
But closer to family is still too vague for a decision.
Be specific about the relationships you are trying to protect or rebuild and how often you would realistically see those people. Family may bring practical support, emotional connection, caregiving obligations or some combination of the three. It is also worth checking whether expectations about your return are aligned and what the same move would mean for a partner or children.
The value of family proximity comes from the relationships that would actually exist after the move, not from the idea of family in the abstract.
Your country of origin may not be your partner’s or children’s home
This is especially important when the household has been abroad for years.
A child may have family roots in one country but school, friends, language habits and identity in another. A partner may be moving toward your support network while moving away from their own. Someone who once expected to return may now have accumulated more to lose abroad.
Map each person’s gains, losses, constraints and uncertainties separately before deciding what the household can accept collectively.
Compare the wider career ecosystem
Geography can affect the range of future opportunities, networks and resources available over time. [5]
Look beyond the first job. Compare the depth of the market in each place, the transferability of the experience you have built abroad and any formal recognition your credentials may need. Consider how many plausible employers exist if the first job fails, what the move would do to your partner’s career and professional network, and which location is likely to leave more credible options a few years from now.
The country with the better current job may still offer the weaker long-term career path.
Decide the next time horizon before deciding forever
People often pressure themselves to answer a permanent question:
“Where do I want to live for the rest of my life?”
That may be larger than the decision actually required.
Research on return migrants shows that a return can be followed by settlement, onward movement or re-emigration. [4] Stay can also mean another year, another career stage or until a specific condition changes.
You may only need to decide the next twelve or twenty-four months rather than the rest of your life. If a key job, family or legal assumption is still uncertain, see whether the hardest-to-reverse step can wait. Preserving credible options in the other country can also matter. Any right to return or remain that depends on legal status should be verified before you rely on it.
Deliberately preserving credible options can be a rational part of the decision.
Use nostalgia as a clue, then verify what it means
Missing a place tells you something important about what you value.
It does not prove that present-day life there will reproduce the experience you miss.
Recent qualitative research on returnees found that nostalgia can reverse direction after return: people who had longed for home could later miss aspects of the former host country. [3]
Try to identify what you actually miss. It may be particular people, your language, food and rituals, a different pace of life, a sense of competence and familiarity, a social role you once had, or even a version of yourself associated with that place.
Then ask whether return is the only credible way to recover those things.
Information worth obtaining before deciding
Before deciding, replace the assumptions that matter most with current information. If feasible, spend meaningful time in the country of origin under conditions closer to normal life than a holiday. Speak with recent returnees who have a comparable family or career situation, price realistic housing and recurring costs, and look at actual jobs rather than salary averages alone. Think through your partner’s ordinary week and gather concrete school, language and logistical information for children. Talk openly with family about availability, expectations and caregiving. Also identify what you would be giving up abroad that may be difficult to rebuild. Immigration, residency, tax, pension, healthcare, benefits and professional licensing questions should be verified with the competent source before being treated as facts.
Which assumption, if false, would make me regret this move most?
Illustrative example
The following circumstances are fictional.
A professional has lived abroad for nine years with a partner and two school-age children. Work is stable, the family has close friends and the children are settled. The professional’s parents and siblings live in the country of origin, and visits increasingly feel too short. The idea of returning has become stronger.
At first the decision sounds simple: more family and cultural connection at home versus more career stability abroad.
The professional has no confirmed job at home. The partner could work in both countries but would need to rebuild a professional network. The children understand the family language but have never attended school in it. Family members are emotionally close, but most live more than an hour from the city where the household would probably work. Housing would be cheaper, but expected earnings would also be lower. The current host country offers a deeper market for both adults’ professions.
The uncertainty now sits in a small number of conditions that can be checked directly.
A strong job secured before the move would reduce career risk. If conversations with relatives show that practical family support would be much less available than expected, one of the main benefits of returning becomes smaller. If the current employer then makes several extended periods near family possible each year, staying solves more of the original problem. A sustained caregiving need for a parent would alter the picture again if the professional genuinely wants to help meet it.
This fictional household shows how the broad question of home or abroad can often be narrowed to a smaller number of conditions that can be examined directly.
When a general guide is not enough
This guide is most useful when the main task is clarifying what each place would provide and the major facts are already known.
The question becomes harder to answer when many variables interact: two careers, children, aging parents, uncertain employment, housing, financial constraints, legal status, timing, professional recognition, another country as a third option, or major disagreement within the household.
Once those factors become central, the home-or-abroad question is too broad. The useful analysis is how those factors interact in your situation.
Erysan’s Fit Check is a free first step to determine whether a structured written analysis is appropriate. It does not commit you to a purchase and it does not assume in advance that Focus or Diagnostic is the right format.
Sources
[1] Hormozinejad, S. Migrants as homo affectus: How emotion shapes return migration among Iranians. Emotion, Space and Society, 2026, 59, 101155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2026.101155
[2] Černigoj, A., Szabó, Á. & Jose, P. Systematic literature review of factors influencing reacculturation after returning home from a stay abroad. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2024, 102, 102037.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102037
[3] Szilasi, J., Fülöp, M. & Nguyen Luu, L. A. Returning home: the decision to come home and the reintegration experiences of Hungarian adults. Current Psychology, 2025, 44, 10948–10966.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07924-7
[4] Czeranowska, O., Parutis, V. & Trąbka, A. Between settlement, double return and re-emigration: motivations for future mobility of Polish and Lithuanian return migrants. Comparative Migration Studies, 2023, 11, 28.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-023-00350-3
[5] Wang, H., Beigi, M. & Baruch, Y. Career success and geographical location: a systematic review and future research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2025, 27, 174–195.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12386
Prepared by Erysan.
Human review: Guillem Blasco.
Research and drafting may use AI-assisted tools. Source selection, factual verification, analysis and final editorial approval are human-reviewed by Guillem Blasco.
